Re: VCAT/LCAS draft update...

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Questions:

Is this something that anyone would ever do without LCAS?

Are there information elements we need to exchange before LSPs are set up 
(i.e. on the Call)?

How much of this is dependent on measurements once LSPs are set up, rather 
than before they are set up?

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jishnu A" <jishnu@india.tejasnetworks.com>
To: <hhelvoort@chello.nl>; "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS'" 
<dbrungard@att.com>
Cc: "'Greg Bernstein'" <gregb@grotto-networking.com>; "'ccamp'" 
<ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: [BULK] VCAT/LCAS draft update...


> Adding to Hubb's reply below
> The MFI field in LCAS allows support upto a maximum of 256ms differential
> delay compensation for HO VC. But the exact value is completely depending 
> on
> the vendor implementation and can be anything between 125us to 256ms.
> Regards,
> Jishnu A
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:hhelvoort@chello.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:34 PM
> To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS
> Cc: Jishnu A; Greg Bernstein; ccamp
> Subject: Re: [BULK] VCAT/LCAS draft update...
> Importance: Low
>
> Hi Deborah,
>
> You replied:
>
> > Shouldn't be a problem if the data plane is based on ITU - so it would
> > need to support (at minimum) ITU's G.707 minimum differential delay
> > requirements for VCAT.
>
> Minimum delay in G.707 is 125 usec (micro-seconds)...
>
> Maximum differential delay depends on implementation.
> Differential is the difference between the largest
> propagation delay of one of the members and the
> smallest propagation delay of one of the members.
> The sink VCAT/LCAS function is capable of detecting
> and reporting whether one or more members does not fit
> the differential delay capability.
>
> Cheers, Huub.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Jishnu A
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:03 AM
> > To: 'Greg Bernstein'
> > Cc: 'ccamp'
> > Subject: RE: [BULK] VCAT/LCAS draft update...
> >
> > Dear Greg,
> > One additional problem with VCAT/LCAS is the amount of differential
> > delay
> > supported at the destination node. Can it be mentioned as a note that
> > co-routing or diversely routing is also based on the availability of
> > enough
> > sufficient differential delay buffer size at the destination node?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jishnu A
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On
> > Behalf
> > Of Greg Bernstein
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:07 AM
> > To: ccamp
> > Subject: [BULK] VCAT/LCAS draft update...
> > Importance: Low
> >
> > Hi folks, I edited the VCAT/LCAS draft to use the CALL_ATTRIBUTES object
> >
> > from the MLN extensions draft.
> > We define a new VCAT TLV for use in the aforementioned object.  All
> > procedures and encodings otherwise are the same as the previous draft.
> > Note that the draft will now be contingent on the MLN extensions draft
> > moving forward.
> >
> > A URL for the Internet-Draft is:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-06.
> > txt
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Greg
>
> --
> ================================================================
>                   http://www.van-helvoort.eu/
> ================================================================
> Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature
> database 3658 (20081202) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature
> database 3658 (20081202) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com