Re: A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP

To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>, <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:00:50 -0000
References: <002901c935f2$92f928d0$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe> <002601c94645$3f25cf20$0601a8c0@allison>
Reply-to: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Tom,

I have seen this announcement on a number of lists but I am unclear whereyou
want the discussion to take place.


Anywhere :-)

If you have issues specific to the use of the I-D in a particular set ofdocuments for a protocol, take it to the list that owns that protocol.

If you have issues related to the draft itself, take it to the routingdiscussion list (routing-discussion@ietf.org)


Cheers,

Adrian

References:
- A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP
  - From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
- Re: A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP
  - From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>