[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)

To: Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>, "Drake, John E" <John.E.Drake2@boeing.com>, Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:39:27 -0400
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org,softwires@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <986393.97601.qm@web36802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <986393.97601.qm@web36802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

At 09:47 AM 9/3/2008, Igor Bryskin wrote:

I do like to hear comments from other people.

IMO this discussion (OSPF and BGP applicability and limitations wrtL1VPNs) was sufficiently covered in the l1vpn WG, and nothing beingsaid now changes the fundamental arguments or conclusions of that discussion.


Lou

PS  PLEASE feel free to drop me from the to/cc line of this thread!

References:
- Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)
  - From: Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)
Next by Date: Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)
Previous by thread: RE: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)
Next by thread: Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG (2nd question)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread