[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks



OK.

Thanks, I will point at the I-Ds, summarise how we are splitting RWA for immediate attention and impairments for future work, note that we do not intend to define impairments (but will defer to the ITU-T on this), and comment that we believe that the modeling of asymmetric switches such as ROADMs may be an area that the ITU-T would like to work on.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Bernstein" <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; <pce@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Comments on ITU's Work Plan for Optical Transport Networks


Hi Adrian and WGs, looking at the ITU-T SG 15's Optical work plan. They put an emphasis on Metro Optical Networks and point out that these can be different from long haul networks in that that they may not need to use regenerators and that these may be significantly more "dynamic" with respect to provisioning than long haul DWDM networks. We should point them at CCAMP's WSON work which includes both the Framework document and the RWA info model document. The modeling of asymmetric switches such as ROADMs seems to have been overlooked at the ITU-T.

Regards

Greg

Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi,

We received a liaison back in February (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/425/) asking for our comments on ITU-T Study Group 15's "Optical Transport Networks & Technologies Standardization Work Plan" (http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com15/otn/index.html)

Please let me know by Friday September 5th if you have any comments you would like us to make. If I don't receive anything, I will send a response to thank them for keeping us informed and asking them to share any future work plans with us.

Thanks,
Adrian



--
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237