2. There is more than one AS
Consider
CE1--PE1...AS1...ASBR1--ASBR2...AS2...PE2--CE2
PE2 advertises reachability to CE2 and includes TE
information. The TE attribute is non-transitive so it is
not just passed on, but ASBR2 wants to announce
reachability to CE2 (in the VPN case, we may want to
support a multi-AS VPN).
So ASBR2 can advertise reachability to CE2, but what TE
parameters does it advertise? The parameters for the
link PE2-CE2 are not so helpful because the TE
reachability across AS2 may be different. Yet any attempt
to perform a computation of the TE reachability across
AS2 (i.e. TE aggregation) is complex and potentially
unstable. (Of course, if a tunnel is pre-established
between ASBR2 and PE2 this is a different matter.)
I think that these two different scenarios need attention
in the I-D.
For the first one, it may just be a matter of indicating
which approach is to be used.
For the second one, I hope the answer is to recommend
against any form of TE aggregation. This could easily be
added to section 4, and I would be happy to provide text.
BUT, it will still leave open the question about if and how
TE information is propagated beyond the AS.