[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

R: Re: [mpls-tp] mpls-tp Dual stack DCN? (was MPLS over OTN)

To: <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: R: Re: [mpls-tp] mpls-tp Dual stack DCN? (was MPLS over OTN)
From: "Diego Caviglia" <diego.caviglia@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:15:58 +0200
Cc: <maarten.vissers@huawei.com>, <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "Diego Caviglia" <diego.caviglia@ericsson.com>, <Italo.Busi@alcatel-lucent.it>, <francesco.fondelli@gmail.com>, <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com>, <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, <mpls-tp@ietf.org>

Stewart,
           I think i agree here.

Even if i'm coming from sdh i don'e see the need to hane osi capability
in brand new mpls-tp boxes.

Br

Diego

Follow-Ups:
- Re: R: Re: [mpls-tp] mpls-tp Dual stack DCN? (was MPLS over OTN)
  - From: Dieter Beller <D.Beller@alcatel-lucent.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [mpls-tp] mpls-tp Dual stack DCN? (was MPLS over OTN)
Next by Date: Re: Comments on 'draft-li-ccamp-wson-igp-eval-01.txt'
Previous by thread: BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG
Next by thread: Re: R: Re: [mpls-tp] mpls-tp Dual stack DCN? (was MPLS over OTN)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread