[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [mpls-tp] MPLS over OTN

Dear all,

Julien's proposed rephrase is good.

By the way, DCN requirements (more specifically Management Communication
Network (MCN) requirements) are already described in
draft-gray-mpls-tp-nm-req-00.txt. Of course comments for improvement are
always welcome.

Regards,
Kam

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Italo Busi
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:14 PM
To: 'Francesco Fondelli'; julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS over OTN

I think that Julien's proposed rephrase better describes the requirement
so I
support it.

It is worth noticing that in case of static configuration and OSI based
DCN, the
MPLS-TP data (transport) plane is actually configured without any IP
functionality.

However I think that DCN requirements should be described in
draft-gray-mpls-tp-nm-req-00.txt.

For the scope of draft-jenkins-mpls-mpls-tp-requirements-00.txt, I think
that it
is more appropriate to rephrase the requirement as proposed by Julien.

Italo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francesco Fondelli
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 6:00 PM
> To: julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS over OTN
> 
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:48 PM,  
> <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:
> > Hi Francesco.
> 
> Hi Julien,
> 
> > I guess I understand your concern. I believe the original 
> intention was
> > to say implicitely "It MUST be possible to operate and configure the
> > MPLS-TP data (transport) plane without any IP functionality 
> *in the data
> > plane*." My interpretation of these requirements is indeed that they
> > apply to the MPLS-TP data plane only, not the 
> MPLS-TP-capable equipment,
> > nor the MPLS-TP control plane...
> >
> > Anyway you're right, this could be confusing and it deserves a small
> > rewording.
> 
> Nice, thanks a lot.
> 
> > Regards,
> >
> > Julien
> 
> Ciao
> FF
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
> 

_______________________________________________
mpls-tp mailing list
mpls-tp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp