[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PWE3] [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work



Loa/Adrian/Stewart,

I think it would be really useful if someone could summarise what
specific proposals/options are being considered for MPLS-TP.  In
particular, given:
-	most operators would regard an OOB CP as an essential component
of a transport network (and this is a forced requirement in the co-cs
mode anyway);
-	GMPLS already uses an OOB CP and there is a long-standing CCAMPs
charter item to unify the GMPLS/MPLS CPs;
-	I believe re-using common CP techniques would also be of
interest to many operators;
then it would appear that the MPLS-TP initiative provides a very good
opportunity to address this.

Any comments?

regards, Neil 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: 12 May 2008 08:34
> To: Adrian Farrel
> Cc: stbryant@cisco.com; Shahram Davari; 'ccamp'; mpls@ietf.org; 'pwe3'
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] proposed charter update for the 
> MPLS TP work
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> 
> 
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Perhaps...
> > OLD
> > Include extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP] protocols
> > NEW
> > Include modifications and extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP]
> > protocols and procedures
> 
> my take on this that we are talking about "extensions" 
> relative the the existing specification, it is quite possible 
> for an extension to leave "components of the MPLS 
> architecture unused", that is in fact the case with most of 
> our documents.
> 
> Consequently I agree with Stewart, and would oppose words 
> like, reduce and modify, since that implies that we intend to 
> *change* the MPLS architecture, while one of the foundations 
> of the agreement to create an MPLS TP was that it should fit 
> into the MPLS architecture.
> 
> /Loa
> > 
> > Adrian
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewart Bryant" 
> > <stbryant@cisco.com>
> > To: "Shahram Davari" <davari@ieee.org>
> > Cc: "'ccamp'" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; <mpls@ietf.org>; "'pwe3'" 
> > <pwe3@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 9:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PWE3] [mpls] proposed charter update for the 
> MPLS TP work
> > 
> > 
> >> I think it was fine as it was. We are not going to do and 
> unnecessary 
> >> extensions, and we are not going to remove any 
> functionality that is 
> >> already in there because we need it for other applications.
> >>
> >> We could perhaps say:
> >>
> >> "Include necessary extensions ...." to make it completely clear.
> >>
> >> Stewart
> >>
> >> Shahram Davari wrote:
> >>> Hi Loa,
> >>>
> >>> Just a clarification. The term reduction means components of the 
> >>> MPLS architecture left unused.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Shahram
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
> >>> Of Shahram Davari
> >>> Sent: May-09-08 2:52 PM
> >>> To: 'Loa Andersson'; 'ccamp'; mpls@ietf.org; 'pwe3'
> >>> Subject: Re: [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work
> >>>
> >>> Hi Loa,
> >>>
> >>> The term "extension" is not very appropriate. It doesn't cover the
> >>> possible
> >>> case of MPLS TP requiring a reduction in MPLS functionality?
> >>>
> >>> How about changing that to "extensions and reductions"
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> -Shahram
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >>> Of Loa
> >>> Andersson
> >>> Sent: May-09-08 6:57 AM
> >>> To: ccamp; mpls@ietf.org; pwe3
> >>> Subject: [mpls] proposed charter update for the MPLS TP work
> >>>
> >>> MPLS, CCAMP and PWE3 working groups,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Joint Working Team of the IETF and ITU-T has resulted in the 
> >>> agreement to create a Transport Profile for MPLS (MPLS TP). This 
> >>> effort requires the MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP Working Groups are 
> >>> chartered to do the required work.
> >>>
> >>> The MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP chairs proposes that we add the 
> following 
> >>> paragraph to the three working group charters:
> >>>
> >>>    "- Include extensions to the [MPLS, PWE3, CCAMP] 
> protocols and RFCs
> >>>       necessary to fulfill an MPLS Transport Profile 
> (MPLS TP), the work
> >>>       on the MPLS TP needs to be coordinated between the 
> three working
> >>>       groups (MPLS, PWE3 and CCAMP) that are chartered to 
> do MPLS TP
> >>>       work."
> >>>
> >>> Please send your comments to the working group(s) mailing list(s) 
> >>> eob Friday May 16.
> >>>
> >>> Adrian, Deborah, Danny, Stewart, George and Loa
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pwe3 mailing list
> >> pwe3@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Loa Andersson
> 
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
>                                             loa@pi.nu
> 
>