Re: Poll for WG Adoption of Two WSON documents

[Wataru Imajuku <imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Hi, Deborah and Adrian

 Both IDs are very much important and should be WG documents.

Best Regards
Wataru

At 00:38 08/04/30, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS wrote:
>CCAMP,
> 
>From Philadelphia, we had good support for adoption of two of the WSON documents as CCAMP working group documents:
> 
>- Framework for WSON
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bernstein-ccamp-wavelength-switched-03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bernstein-ccamp-wavelength-switched-03.txt
> 
>- Lambda Labels
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-lambda-labels-02.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-lambda-labels-02.txt
> 
>Please express your opinions (authors, we welcome your opinion also).
> 
>Thanks,
>Adrian and Deborah

-------------------------------------
Wataru Imajuku@NTT Network Innovation Labs
TEL: +81-46-859-4315
FAX: +81-46-859-5541