Re: Two more working group last calls

[Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>]

Adrian,
        See below for minor comments:

At 11:12 AM 4/11/2008, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the continued bombardment with reviewing activity.
>
> Here are two drafts that were discussed in Philadelphia with the 
> intention to go to WG last call as soon as possible.
>
> draft-ietf-rfc4420-bis-02.txt

I assume that you mean draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc4420bis-02.txt.


> This is the revision to RFC 4420 to fix the TLV encoding to be 
> consistent with the previous RSVP-TE RFCs. The fix is to the 
> interpretation of the Length field.
> Although we might not expect much in the way of review comments for 
> this I-D, it would be very helpful if you could read the I-D, point 
> out any typos, and send a note to say that you have read the 
> document and believe it is ready for publication.

Only a minor suggestion here:

I suggest moving the rational for the updated provided from section 
14 to section 1.  Specifically:

- drop section 14
- section 1, 1st paragraph: drop "See Section 14 for a summary of 
changes." and add:
   Prior to the change, the Length field indicated the length of the
   Value field only. After the change, as described in Section 3, the
   Length field indicates the length of the whole TLV. This change means
   that this document is consistent with the subobject format defined in
   [RFC3209] and the TLV format defined in [RFC3471].

Lou

> Please send your reviews to the list by 12 noon GMT, April 26, 2008.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> PS, I'll be notifying the MPLS mailing list of these two last calls.