Hi,
From Philadelphia, we have four candidate I-Ds for adoption as CCAMP
working
group documents.
Please express your opinions.
Note that acceptance of these I-Ds does not mean that the discussion
about the architecture is done. I think we made some progress on that
topic in Philadelphia, and I think the authors took on the task of
making some updates of semantics and for clarity, but I expect the
discussion may go on for a while.
draft-imajuku-ccamp-ethernet-gmpls-req-01.txt
draft-fedyk-gmpls-ethernet-pbb-te-02.txt
draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-mef-uni-02.txt
draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-ether-svcs-01.txt
Thanks,
Adrian