GELS: what happened alternatively what will happen

[Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi Loa,

Deborah and I want to move the Ethernet I-Ds forward (into the WG) as 
quickly as possible, but we also need to organise our thoughts.

Can you give us a couple of days to work out what we want to do with the 
drafts, and in what order?

In the mean time, a reminder to the whole WG that they should review and 
comment on the list. Questions and issues are welcomed. Suggested text is 
best.

Thanks,
Adrian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se>
To: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 2:28 AM
Subject: what happened alternatively what will happen


> Adrian and Deborah,
>
> yesterday a set of IDs on GMPLS control of Ethernet were presented;
> given that I remember correctly the author of the requirement draft
> said they think that the draft will be ready to become a working
> group document after next IETF meeting.
>
> The authors of the architecture draft for GMPLS controlled Ethernet
> and the protocol extensions for control of PBT-TE networks requested
> that their draft should be accepted as working group documents.
>
> No sense of the room were taken or "take it to the list" statement.
>
> What's the plan?
>
> /Loa
> --
> Loa Andersson
>
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
>                                           loa@pi.se
>
> This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. 
> http://www.astaro.com