[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vancouver agenda



Hi Adrian,

We have updated our draft. If possible, I would also ask a small time slot to present the appended signaling issues in our I-D.

Thank you very much,

Sugang

Greg Bernstein wrote:

Hi Adrian, there seems to be some interest in the wavelength switched optical stuff. There should be: (a) framework discussion/draft (we've updated and would like this to be a working group draft)
(b) label format (I was hoping Otani et. al. would be updating their draft)
(c) signaling discussions (I've just submitted a draft and last time Xu/King had a draft) (d) information for RWA (I'll be submitting this shortly, its independent of how we distribute it, e.g., an IGP or some other method)

Hence this would make a moderately "chunky" session or sub-session.

Regards

Greg B.

Adrian Farrel wrote:

Hi,

We have again requested two meetings for Vancouver (although the Secretariat appears to have allocated three!).

So we need to start building our agenda.

We want to have some chunky sessions to discuss
- The progress with GELS
- Issues and developments for distribution of TE information
  from outside ASes
  See
  -  Mach's I-Ds for inter-AS TE links
  - Yakov/Don's I-D for BGP-TE
  - JP's (expired?) proposal for CE-PE TE link advertisement
     in BGP

What else would you like to see on the agenda?

Cheers,
Adrian (per pro Deborah)