[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 3:16 PM
> Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > When we asked about adopting 
> > draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG 
> document we didn't 
> > get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are 
> authors on the 
> > draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
> > 
> > The new revision, 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
> > to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the 
> list, and some of 
> > our own concerns.
> > 
> > So, second time of asking...
> > 
> > Do you think 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
> > adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
> > 

In Favor, 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar 

> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>