[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 3:16 PM
> Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When we asked about adopting
> > draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG
> document we didn't
> > get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are
> authors on the
> > draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
> >
> > The new revision,
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts
> > to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the
> list, and some of
> > our own concerns.
> >
> > So, second time of asking...
> >
> > Do you think
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be
> > adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
> >
In Favor,
Thanks
Regards... Zafar
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>