Re: Proposed new working group draft

[Tomonori TAKEDA <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Support

Tomonori

At 21:31 07/09/29, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Now that the MLN requirements and protocol evaluation have completed last 
call with just a couple of comments, and now that we have more or less 
reached stability with our liaisons to the ITU-T on this subject, we need 
to look for a solutions I-D.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-04.txt 
has been running for some time and tracking both the requirements and the 
lacunae identified by the evaluation draft. It seems that this provides a 
good basis for the protocol work in CCAMP even if some elements might change.
>
>Please express your support or otherwise for this I-D to become a WG draft.
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>
>