[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Proposed new working group draft



Hi Adrian, all

I strongly support this ID, I'm co-author :-)

Regards

JL 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] De la part de Martin Vigoureux
> Envoyé : jeudi 4 octobre 2007 09:49
> À : zzx-adrian@olddog.co.uk
> Cc : ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Objet : Re: Proposed new working group draft
> 
> Adrian,
> 
> I do support this I-D.
> 
> martin
> 
> 
> Adrian Farrel a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Now that the MLN requirements and protocol evaluation have 
> completed 
> > last call with just a couple of comments, and now that we 
> have more or 
> > less reached stability with our liaisons to the ITU-T on 
> this subject, 
> > we need to look for a solutions I-D.
> > 
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mr
> > n-extensions-04.txt has been running for some time and 
> tracking both 
> > the requirements and the lacunae identified by the 
> evaluation draft. 
> > It seems that this provides a good basis for the protocol work in 
> > CCAMP even if some elements might change.
> > 
> > Please express your support or otherwise for this I-D to 
> become a WG draft.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>