[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: accepting draft-fedyk-bgp-te-attribute-02.txt as a CCAMP WG document



2. Could you conceive of using your I-D to meet the requirements of the Vasseur I-D?

In order for me to answer this question I'd like to get a clear
description of the requirements of the Vasseur I-D.

I'm not trying to fight JP's battles for him.
Just trying to find out whether we have two problem spaces or one.

I think the abstract of his I-D is relatively clear:

  This document proposes MP-BGP protocol extension so as to convey
  Traffic Engineering Link characterictics of PE (Provider Edge) - CE
  (Customer Edge) links in order to extend the visibility of the
  Traffic Engineering Database to those links.  This can then be used
  to more efficiently compute CE-to-CE Traffic Engineering Label

A