Re: accepting draft-fedyk-bgp-te-attribute-02.txt as a CCAMP WG document

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi Yakov,

Could you explain why we would want to adopt 
draft-fedyk-bgp-te-attribute-03.txt (note that your draft is at revision 03) 
rather than draft-vasseur-ccamp-ce-ce-te-02.txt

The scope of your draft seems to be very open-ended which is quite worrying. 
Perhaps you could help by telling us what the application space is. Your 
introduction section suggests that *an* application is L1VPN, and if that is 
a representative application then your scope is identical to the Vasseur 
draft.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Yakov Rekhter" <yakov@juniper.net>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" 
<dbrungard@att.com>; <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "Hamid Ould-Brahim" <hbrahim@nortel.com>; "Don Fedyk" 
<dwfedyk@nortel.com>; <yakov@juniper.net>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: accepting draft-fedyk-bgp-te-attribute-02.txt as a CCAMP WG 
document


> Deborah and Adrian,
>
> On behalf of the authors of draft-fedyk-bgp-te-attribute-02.txt we
> would like to propose to accept this draft as a CCAMP WG document.
> This draft went through IDR review and we incorporated the comments
> in the latest version.
>
> Yakov.