[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pce] Some key issues with Wavelength Switched Optical Networks...



Very good catch Igor. See in line.

Igor Bryskin wrote:
--snip--



 

2. Considering wavelength conversion inevitably brings to the problem of looped paths, which is a completely new ball game in path computation, and I am surprised that the issue was never mentioned in the draft.

--> How is this different from the "looping" that can occur with a TDM multiplexer in a drop and continue mode?  Also in these two circuit cases (TDM, and optical) do we have the same danger as in the packet case where looping traffic can greatly degrade other flows.  Was there some general looping concerns already published for GMPLS with respect to circuits? 

 

IB>> There is a profound difference. I am not talking here about accidental looping, rather about deliberate looping: if some nodes can perform wavelength conversion while others can not, then you will want to route the connection to one or several conversion points and after that get it back on the main path. In other words you will deliberately request, say, a PCE to produce looped path, and then GMPLS RSVP-TE to signal looped path, which is completely out of normal paradigm of work for both PCE and RSVP.

--> I thought you were worried about accidental loops.  I didn't even consider what you are talking about "looping", but would RSVP processing get fouled up? It sure looks like a loop at the "node" level.
In the ERO the "node" subobject (IP4, IP6, AS) could definitely be repeated, but with a different "Label ERO" subobject appended. This is definitely something somebody would not to in the MPLS or TDM case.  I'll be sure to add it as an important difference in the next revision. Thanks!

 

Cheers,

Igor

 


--snip--
-- 
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237