Update for the "IGP extention in support of Inter-AS TE" drafts(resend for some nits in the previous email:-))

Hi forks,

We have updated these two I-Ds since IETF 69th in Chicago, where we received a lot of useful comments and suggestion. You could reach them by the following links:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-ccamp-isis-interas-te-extension-01.txt

Compare to rev.00, the main changes in rev.01 are listed below:

1. Wording changes in several places;

2. According to Kireeti's comments, make a clear statement "There is no OSPF adjacency running on the inter-AS link";

3. Enhance the PCE-based scenario to explain that the AS number property of an inter-AS TE link is needed, and clearly state that the AS number sub-TLV is mandatory;

4. Add the missing part about that the local ASBR SHOULD do a "proxy" advertisement for the backward of an inter-AS TE link; 5. Enhance the Security section.

Any feedback and comments are welcome!

Best regards,

Mach