Re: Polling for two new working group I-Ds

[Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>]

Yes to both I-Ds.

Dan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 11:33 PM
Subject: Polling for two new working group I-Ds


> Hi,
> 
> In Chicago we considered the possibility of two new CCAMP drafts. Please 
> give your opinions:
> 
> 1. draft-chen-ccamp-isis-interas-te-extension-00.txt
> This is a partner draft to draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-00.txt
> The draft was discussed at the ISIS working group and several questions of 
> detail were raised.
> Thus, accepting this I-D now, does not imply that we would not change the 
> mechanism.
> 
> 2. draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt
> This work is a charter milestone, and Deborah and I are both co-authors, so 
> we are likely to be influenced in favour of adoption. So please voice your 
> opinions loud and clear.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian 
> 
> 
>