Hi,
In Prague we discussed this draft and the general opinion seemed to be
that this is a useful extension, but that some clarifications needed
to be added to the I-D. This new revision appears to address all of
the concerns as below.
Therefore given the interest in Prague and the relevance of this I-D
to our inter-domain TE charter actions, we are polling the WG for
adoption of this I-D as a CCAMP draft.
Opinions please.
Thanks
Adrian and Deborah
====
Overlap with L1VPN autodiscovery
A question was raised as to whether there was an overlap
with the L1VPN autodiscovery work used to distribute
membership information (draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery)
It appears that the mechanisms and purposes are different.
The authors have added text to clarify that there is no overlap.
Language change for "OSPF" becomes "OSPF-TE"
Concern was raised that the I-D talked about "OSPF" but the
function is "OSPF-TE".
The authors have updated the I-D accordingly.
Include reference to OSPFv3 as well
A request was made to include OSPFv3.
The authors have added text to explain that the same extensions
apply to OSPF v2 and OSPF v3 TE extensions.
Make it *incredibly* clear that TE distribution between ASes is
not in scope.
Although the I-D had plenty of this material, the authors have
beefed it up further by including the list of things that they are
not doing from their Prague slides.