Re: Three liaison statements received from the ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 14

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Greg,

That would be admirable.

Thanks!

Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Bernstein" <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Three liaison statements received from the ITU-T Study Group 15 
Question 14


> Hi Adrian, I see they have a slew of questions on the VCAT/LCAS draft. 
> What is the proper procedure for generating a response? Do I, as editor, 
> take a first shot and then send to the list. Then we take it from there 
> (if we get any responses).
> Regards
>
> Greg B.
>
>
>
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At their meeting in Chicago earlier this month, Q14/15 generated three 
> > responses to our liaisons.
> >
> > You can see these at www.olddog.co.uk/ccamp.htm or on the IETF liaison 
> > page as follows:
> >
> > Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on Call/Connection Separation in ASON and 
> > GMPLS
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file420.doc
> >
> > Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on Multi-Layer Networking
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file419.doc
> >
> > Liaison Statement to IETF CCAMP on VCAT/LCAS Signalling
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file418.doc
> >
> > The third of these is for Action and needs a response from us by 28th May 
> > 2007
> >
> > Adrian
>
> --
> ===================================================
> Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237