[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Draft liaison to ITU-T SG 15 : VCAT
Hello Adrian,
I agree with what you propose, apart from a small
editorial change, see in-line [hvh]
Cheers, Huub.
------------------------------
> Here is the second draft liaison to go to ITU-T SG15.
>
> Again, comments by end of 3rd April, please.
>
> (Plenty more to follow, but we will try to turn them out a few at a time.)
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian and Deborah
>
> ===
>
> To: ITU-T SG15
> From: IETF CCAMP
> Cc: Stephen Trowbridge; Kam Lam; Scott Bradner; Ross Callon; Dave Ward
> Subject: VCAT/LCAS Work in CCAMP
> For Comment
> Deadline: 25th June 2007
>
> The CCAMP working group thanks you for your liaison "Liaison Statement to
> CCAMP regarding work on calls and Vcat/LCAS" dated March 2007.
>
> We are not sure that the Internet-Draft
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-01.txt does use mechanisms defined by ITU-T
> SG 15 in Recommendations G.7041 and G.7042. We believe that the intention is
> to enable the use of such mechanisms in a GMPLS network
[hvh] recommendation G.7041 does not contain any VCAT/LCAS
mechanism (it is the GFP definition), G.7042 is the generic LCAS definition. PDH VCAT is defined in G.7043, SDH/SONET VCAT in G.707 and OTN VCAT in G.709.
G.7042, G.7043, G.707 and G.709 are referenced in draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-01
I propose to remove G.7041 or replace it by G.7043.
(yes, it is in the original SG15 liaison text, but it is not
necessary to repeat the typo)
> Nevertheless, we note your interest in this work and would welcome your
> comments especially with respect to the applicability of this work to an
> ASON network.
>
> The current published version of this work can be found at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-01.txt.
> Please note, however, that a new version of this draft is currently being
> prepared by the authors that makes extensive changes to the published
> material. Therefore, while we would welcome your comments, we suggest that
> you do not invest heavily in a detailed review at this stage.
>
> We will liaise future versions of this Internet-Draft to you as they become
> available.
>
> Best regards,
> Adrian Farrel and Deborah Brungard
> Co-chairs, IETF CCAMP Working Group