Re: Draft liaison to ITU-T SG15 : MLN work

[Monique Morrow <mmorrow@cisco.com>]

Looks ok Adrian!

/m


On 28/3/07 3:22 pm, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here is the first of a series of proposed liaisons to ITU-T Study Group 15.
> 
> Please comment by end of business 3rd April.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian and Deborah
> ====
> To: ITU-T SG15
> Cc: Stephen Trowbridge; Kam Lam; Scott Bradner; Ross Callon; Dave Ward
> Subject: Multi-Layer Networking (MLN) Work in CCAMP
> For Action
> Deadline: 18th May 2007
> 
> The CCAMP working group notes your request to review its work on Multi-Layer
> Networking (MLN) as indicated in your liaison "Liaison Statement to CCAMP
> responding to ccamp liaison of 21 February 2007" dated March 2007.
> 
> We are nearing completion of our analysis of the requirements for MLN, and
> our evaluation of existing protocols, so now is an appropriate time for you
> review this material, and we would be grateful for your comments on or
> before the deadline marked above.
> 
> The requirements work can be found at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-02.txt
> The protocol evaluation is at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-02.txt
> 
> In your review of this material, it may be helpful to pay particular care to
> understand the definition of MLN that is used. It may also be helpful to use
> some of the terminology interpretation presented in RFC4397.
> 
> The CCAMP working group also anticipates working on protocol extensions to
> fill the lacunae identified by the protocol evaluation Internet-Draft. An
> individual submission on this subject may be found at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extens
> ions-03.txt, 
> but the working group has yet to make a decision about whether to accept
> this as the basis for the work.
> 
> Best regards,
> Adrian Farrel and Deborah Brungard
> Co-chairs, IETF CCAMP Working Group
>