Fw: Progressing the discussion on liaison responses

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi,

The Rapporteur of Question 14 of Study Group 15 of the ITU-T  has indicated 
that we have a little more time to generate responses to their recent 
liaisons. Nevertheless, we will try to do what we can to get response out 
quickly where the actions are simple.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <hklam@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS" 
<dbrungard@att.com>
Cc: "Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:37 PM
Subject: RE: Progressing the discussion on liaison responses


Dear Adrian and Deborah,

Slides 9, 10, & 11 indicate that the Q14/15 liaisons are just in and
requesting response from ccamp by April 6th/2nd. Usually we set the
expected responding date so that Q14/15 can consider the reply at the
next meeting. This time, the Darmstadt meeting and the Chicago meeting
are so close. I agree the notice is too short. So for these two Q14/15
liaisons, please take your time to have sufficient discussion within
ccamp. If we can have the ccamp response by May 28 (Monday), we will be
able to address it at the next SG15 Geneva meeting, which is June 4 -
15.

Best Regards,
Kam


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:39 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Progressing the discussion on liaison responses
>
> Hi,
>
> Would appreciate it if you looked at the various liaisons and
> correspondence at www.olddog.co.uk/ccamp.htm and the slides
> Deborah and I wrote at
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/ccamp-19.ppt
>
> Please comment on any aspect of any of the correspondence as
> Deborah and I try to put together responses. Would be nice if
> your comments were on the CCAMP list rather than in private.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian