Re: Next steps for draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-01.txt....

[Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be]

zafar -

o) would it be possible to sum'up changes you have been provided 
since so far ?

o) would it be possible to clarify the following statement

"- Graceful shutdown mechanisms are required to address TE LSPs 
   spanning multiple domains, as well as intra domain TE LSPs. "

afaik you don't shutdown LSPs but Links - right ?

thanks,
-d.





"Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <zali@cisco.com>
Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
02/03/2007 00:41
 
        To:     "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "Brungard, Deborah 
A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, Dimitri PAPADIMITRIOU/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
        cc:     <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "Jean Philippe Vasseur \(jvasseur\)" 
<jvasseur@cisco.com>, "Anca Zamfir \(ancaz\)" <ancaz@cisco.com>
        Subject:        Next steps for 
draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-01.txt....


Hi Adrian, Deborah, Dimitri, and campers- 
 
As we mentioned at the last IETF meeting, 
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/slides/ccamp-17/sld1.htm, we have 
addressed all outstanding comments, except the following comment from 
Dimitri, related to this ID. Should you have any further comment, please 
share. 
 
The only remaining comment that is not closed is "should this ID be 
informational or standard track". IMO the ID defines a new error-subcode 
and some specific behavior, and should be standard track. Can you please 
comment on this. 
 
The ID has been stable for quite some time and following the closure of 
the above, we would like to request last call. 
 
Thanks
 
Regards... Zafar