[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt
let's go back to basic
per RFC 3471
"4. Bidirectional LSPs
This section defines direct support of bidirectional LSPs. Support
is defined for LSPs that have the same traffic engineering
requirements including fate sharing, protection and restoration,
LSRs, and resource requirements (e.g., latency and jitter) in each
direction."
what does it mean in practice that Path msg can carry a TSPEC and the
Resv a FLOWSPEC, and still allow for establishment of two data paths
(upstream & downstream)
[...]
"With bidirectional LSPs both the downstream and upstream data paths,
i.e., from initiator to terminator and terminator to initiator, they
are established using a single set of signaling messages."
in brief, a single msg exchange for two data paths (upstream & downstream)
but if you change the initial condition and still be somehow respectful
of the RSVP operation
the path msg shall carry an (upstream) FLOWSPEC and (downstream) TSPEC
and not a downstream TSPEC and a (default) TSPEC, but now you got the
real issue of carrying a FLOWSPEC in a Path msg ???
hence, better forget about this idea and look at a simple extensions
consisting in linking two uni-directional LSP with an association
oject
ps: the document includes in many places "marketing-like" statements
completely - examples
" The limitation of symmetrical resource requirements may pose
difficulties for operators to efficiently support the services
foreseen for next generation networks."
pls give us a break with all the hype and hubub about "services
foreseen for next generation networks"
"Means must be provided by higher
layer entities, e.g., the network management system (NMS), to
correlate the LSPs not just from RSVP-TE but also from an OAM point
of view. "
which OAM ??? never heard someone complaining when using MPLS-BFD
where is the proof point ?
"Additionally, translation functionality may be required to
provide operators with a service oriented bidirectional abstraction
hiding the complex control plane operation."
could you speak with an IETF language please, this sentence just
mean nothing
thanks,
-d.
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
27/02/2007 21:50
Please respond to internet-drafts
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
cc:
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE extension
in support of bidirectional LSPs with
Author(s) : A. Takacs, et al.
Filename : draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt
Pages : 8
Date : 2007-2-27
GMPLS provides general connection control functionality supporting
different network technologies. This memo specifies a further
generalization to support bidirectional LSPs with asymmetric
requirements. The extension improves the flexibility of bidirectional
LSP establishment and at the same time simplifies the control and
management of asymmetric services.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt
To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to
i-d-announce-request@ietf.org with the word unsubscribe in the body of
the message.
You can also visit https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce
to change your subscription settings.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the
username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After
logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then
"get draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt".
A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
Send a message to:
mailserv@ietf.org.
In the body type:
"FILE /internet-drafts/draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt".
NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use
this
feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the
"FILE"
command. To decode the response(s), you will need
"munpack" or
a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant
mail readers
exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
"multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been
split
up into multiple messages), so check your local
documentation on
how to manipulate these messages.
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.
ftp://anonymous@ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takacs-asym-bw-lsp-00.txt
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce