To: sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy), hartmans-ietf@mit.edu
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: Security considerations with
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-07
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, dbrungard@att.com,
derek@ihtfp.com, sandy@tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <20070214183140.513D73F47E@pecan.tislabs.com>
References: <tsltzxzp0er.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 01:31 PM 2/14/2007 -0500, Sandy Murphy wrote:
>I think we may need a conference call on this. What times would work
>for people next week?
I saw this a bit late at NANOG and was debating how to respond to the
approach
Sam suggested. And never replied, myself. I saw no other replies, and it
is
now the middle of "next week". Did I miss the replies? Is a conference
call
still a good idea?
--Sandy
No, there haven't yet been replies.
Adrian has been busy becoming a grandfather (relative to my
experience, a case of "young kids having grand-babies"). He
is just back from this exhausting but successful experience.
I read Sam's proposal, but don't know how to respond and
thus was waiting to give Adrian time to look at it in detail.
Ross