Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-02.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi,

This revision addresses comments made in GenArt review and SecDir review.

The changes are small fixes to the wording to make a couple of points 
clearer.

The draft should now continue forward in the process.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org>
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:50 PM
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-02.txt


> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane 
> Working Group of the IETF.
>
> Title : Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) RSVP-TE Signaling Extensions in support 
> of Calls
> Author(s) : D. Papadimitriou, A. Farrel
> Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-02.txt
> Pages : 29
> Date : 2007-1-3
>
> In certain networking topologies, it may be advantageous to maintain
>   associations between endpoints and key transit points to support an
>   instance of a service. Such associations are known as Calls.
>
>   A Call does not provide the actual connectivity for transmitting user
>   traffic, but only builds a relationship by which subsequent
>   Connections may be made. In Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) such Connections
>   are known as Label Switched Paths (LSPs).
>
>   This document specifies how GMPLS RSVP-TE signaling may be used and
>   extended to support Calls. These mechanisms provide full and logical
>   Call/Connection separation.
>
>   The mechanisms proposed in this document are applicable to any
>   environment (including multi-area), and for any type of interface:
>   packet, layer-2, time-division multiplexed, lambda, or fiber
>   switching.
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-02.txt