RE: Polling for new WG IDs

["MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN" <julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com>]

Hi all.

1. I agree with Alessandro about draft-caviglia.

2. I'm still a bit confused with draft-kumaki positioning, so I'm not sure it's ready for WG document...

3. I support draft-takeda.


Have a good week-end,

Julien

________________________________

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Capello Alessandro

Yes to 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt> 

I think this is an important issue for the evolution of transport networks.

 

Regards,

Alessandro

 

________________________________

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS

Hi,

 

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

 

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

 

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

 

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

 

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by
replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it> .
        Thank you
                                        www.telecomitalia.it <http://www.telecomitalia.it> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------