Re: Polling for new WG IDs

[Wataru Imajuku <imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Hi, All


> 1. 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 Yes. This is real issue if operators wants to shift their operation to 
GMPLS controlled networks without disruption of services. It is preferable 
to have this choice for network operators.

 Yes.
> 2. 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

Yes

> 3. 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

 Yes. This draft is now handling inter-domain MPLS/GMPLS E2E recovery and 
siscussed following to WG charter.

 Also, I have to comment on 
draft-imajuku-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-req-01.txt which
came from same organization (NTT) form Takeda draft.
 Draft-imajuku-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-req-01.txt is handling 
interdomain GMPLS based
 non-E2E recovery. This draft does not include requirement for MPLS. This 
is the reason NTT team did not migrated the requirements described in this 
draft to Takeda draft.
 But, I hope this draft would be charter issue after next re-charter phase.
 I'm happy if we could share our thought with all CCAMPers.

Best Regards
Wataru

-------------------------------------
Wataru Imajuku@NTT Network Innovation Labs
TEL: +81-46-859-4315
FAX: +81-468-59-5541