[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LCAS/VCAT



Hi,

I am interested in this work and think it's a useful functionality, but also have some questions on this draft:
1) In section 3.2, four scenarios have been described. Is there any requirement for the VCAT/LCAS capabilities for each scenario? or there is no such relationship between the scenarios and the VCAT/LCAS capabilities?
2) In section 4.2, for diversely routed VCG, what I understand is separately setup a set of LSPs which have same Ingress and Egress nodes, and associate these LSPs as a VCG at both Ingress and Egress nodes.  Could you elaborate how to manage/use the VCG? i.e. how to use the VCG to support the required service? I think at both ends of the VCG, the same signal adaptation should be required.

Thanks,

Dan


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: LCAS/VCAT


> Hi,
> 
> In San Diego Richard presented the current status of 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-01.txt and suggested that the work is 
> nearing completion.
> 
> A quick show of hands indicated that very few had read the draft. This may 
> be because it is a very narrow niche that only a few are interested in 
> (i.e., all of the key people have read it), or may be because more people 
> need to have a look.
> 
> If you are interested in this work, could you please find some time 
> relatively soon to have a look at the draft and send your comments to the 
> list.
> 
> If you have or are planning an implementation could you drop me a private 
> (confidential!) email.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian 
> 
> 
> 
>