Re: Polling for new WG IDs

Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs

From: "Richard Rabbat" <rabbat@alum.mit.edu>

Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:48:29 -0800

Cc: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=WUAdhAqm/F6BnNOymSu6sX2BV4eAZ9ovWcsqR1EFAJCc9+quWtzzjA5iP1Ge8LiTz3IK6FmSeNkNQPboR5BsZDStJbVnhopCIdWZkbynvrkMoGeaJTEQ+DaD6ZVkQ46H7zjUsEuTaWgoqkhMe5Upj1DDfC8KgkkuQiEUKyRIJy0=

In-reply-to: <70BC84B185C3EE448EDB7AB8956D3B0E02AF332C@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>

References: <70BC84B185C3EE448EDB7AB8956D3B0E02AF332C@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>

On 12/1/06, Dean Cheng (dcheng) <dcheng@cisco.com> wrote:

Yes to all.

Dean

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:23 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian

References:

RE: Polling for new WG IDs
- From: "Dean Cheng \(dcheng\)" <dcheng@cisco.com>