RE: Polling for new WG I-Ds

[<benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com>]

Igor,

owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org <> wrote:
> Deborah.
> (My hat off since I am talking to a lady)
> 
> Have you been in a situation when you just performed a
> software upgrade and a network operator tells you that your
> new release sucks and he wants the network in the state of
> this morning prior to the upgrade? No? Than you are lucky.

I'm not sure I understand the relevance of this.

> Besides, what is the problem with moving "hundreds/thousands
> of LSPs from CP->MP"?

The operating tenet is "if it aint broke don't fix it" so it'd likely
have to be a very good reason in order to make an operator move
hundreds/thousands of LSPs from CP->MP or MP->CP.  It'd also have to be
something forseeable as I can't see operators moving their LSPs from
CP->MP routinely when doing a software change.

Ben