[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-06.txt [P2MP ID]

George,
        Glad to see I'm not the only one who holds this opinion!

Lou

At 03:11 PM 6/28/2006, George Swallow wrote:


> Since a tuple <Extended Tunnel ID, P2MP ID> is sufficient to identify
> the tunnel, the same tuple is sufficient to identify the set of
> destinations of the tunnel. Therefore, the Tunnel ID is not
> needed to identify the set of destinations of the tunnel.

I really don't understand this drive to change semantics that have been
stable since we began working on this draft, and that are consistent
with 3209 this late in the game.  I am TOTALLY opposed to it.

...George

========================================================================
George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  (978) 936-1398
                           1414 Massachusetts Avenue
                           Boxborough, MA 01719