[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-10.txt

To: "<jcucchiara@mindspring.com>" <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-10.txt
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:42:50 -0400
Cc: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, <bwijnen@lucent.com>, <dromasca@avaya.com>, <kireeti@juniper.net>
In-reply-to: <005101c664de$0c8b2240$0500a8c0@jlucianilaptop>
References: <005101c664de$0c8b2240$0500a8c0@jlucianilaptop>


	Cool. I have updated this based on your review of
the GMPLS LSR MIB yesterday.

	--Tom

Tom and Adrian,

One minor comments, which is the
expiration date in the header needs
updating.  Otherwise, this document
looks good.

-Joan

References:
- MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-10.txt
  - From: <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>

Prev by Date: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-10.txt
Next by Date: RE: [Pce] Comparison of Encryption vs. Path Key Solutions for the CPSID.
Previous by thread: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-10.txt
Next by thread: RE: [Pce] Comparison of Encryption vs. Path Key Solutions for the CPSID.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread