Re: New revision of GMPLS TE MIB

[<jcucchiara@mindspring.com>]

Thanks  Adrian and Tom!

Will take a look at all 3 of the MIBs
and give update by end of this week.

Thanks,
  Joan


----- Original Message -----
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: Joan Cucchiara <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>; Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
<bwijnen@lucent.com>; Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@cisco.com>; <zinin@psg.com>;
Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: New revision of GMPLS TE MIB


> Hi,
>
> I have just submitted a new revision of the GMPLS TE MIB
> (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-13.txt) which should be posted soon.
>
> The changes are to complete the markups from MIB Doctor review and
> comprise changes to the conformance and compliance sections of the MIB
> module as requested.
>
> I have also made the following changes:
> - added comments to IANAGmplsGeneralizedPid to highlight the lacunae.
> - updated references to RFC 4328
> - correct possible settings of mplsTunnelIsIf which is TruthValue
> - retire gmplsTunnelIsNotIntfcGroup which had become empty
> - correct the example to use gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType
>   and gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient
> - correct the hex value of an IP address in the example
>
> We will show this to the MIB Doctors to check that they are happy with all
> of our changes, and then get the IESG process into motion.
>
> Adrian
>
>
>