Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi,

Looks like good support for this proposal.

There are also some key points raised for future discussion.

Editors:
- Please submit your drafts as
   draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-00.txt
   draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-00.txt
   NOTE the change from mrn to mln in the draft name
- Please make no other changes to the drafts except
  - dates
  - copyright is now 2006
  - the document names as above

Thanks,
Adrian


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:55 PM
Subject: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks


> Hi,
>
> We have a charter milestone to start WG work on a Requirements I-D for
> MRN/MLN, and also an Evaluation I-D to examine how the current protocols
> shape up to the challenge.
>
> There are two appropriate I-Ds that have been around for a while.
>
> draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-03.txt
> draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-02.txt
>
> I propose that we make these WG documents and then give them a thorough
> review and edit.
>
> Opinions please.
>
> Yes or no will suffice, but reasons are always nice.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
>
>