in line
Tom -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: Tom Petch <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>; ccamp@ops.ietf.org <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> Date: 13 May 2004 20:12 Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt
>A reasonable request, Tom. >And heaven knows I have enough other stuff to do. > >For the record, I took this on in order to drive the work through in a shape that was >agreed by the WG. I'm more than happy to drop to the role of contributing author. > >Tom, are you busy? What do you know about multi-area/AS? Could you be the editor? >
I am flattered by the offer but no, that was not what I had in mind:-)
The draft looks fine and perhaps will need little further work. And I have no problems with your work as chair or as editor.
But in this case, multiple editors are listed in the I-D - et and al - and if they are still actively involved,
I thought we could produce better output, even quicker output, by having two brains working on it rather than one ie editor editing, chairman chairing.
But I have seen the other posts supporting your dual role so, so be it.
tom
>Adrian > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com> >To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> >Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 8:52 PM >Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt > >> I always have a reservation when the WG chair and the I-D editor are or >> turn out to be the same individual. I think that the IETF discourages this >> for good reason and so for this to be adopted, I would like someone other >> than the WG chair to take the role of (lead) editor. >> >> Tom Petch >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> >> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> >> Date: 06 May 2004 22:08 >> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt >> >> >> >Folks, >> > >> >This draft represents the first step in the much-discussed six point pl an >> towards >> >inter-area/AS solutions. >> > >> >I would like three things to happen: >> > >> >a. This draft to become a WG draft >> > Please send your opinions >> >b. The draft to be reinforced in areas that people consider necessary >> > One such area MAY be diverse routing. >> > Please send suggested text, but >> > - recall that this is not a solutions draft >> > - try to keep the length of the draft down below 100 pages >> >c. Move on with the next step in the plan. >> > At the moment, this seems to require effort on points 2 and 4 >> > Viz, develop individual signaling solutions as required and >> > state their applicability. >> > We await input from those who have preferred solutions. >> > >> >Cheers, >> >Adrian >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> >> >To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> >> >Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> >> >Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:44 PM >> >Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt >> > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> >> >> >> Title : A Framework for Inter-Domain MPLS Traffic Engineering >> >> Author(s) : A. Farrel, et al. >> >> Filename : draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-00.txt >> >> Pages : 14 >> >> Date : 2004-4-30 >> >> >> >> This document provides a framework for establishing and controlling >> >> Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) >> >> Label Switched Paths (LSPs) in multi-domain networks. >> >> >> >> For the purposes of this document, a domain is considered to be any >> >> collection of network elements within a common sphere of address >> >> management or path computational responsibility. Examples of such >> >> domains include IGP areas and Autonomous Systems. >> >> >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-ccamp-inter-domain-framewo >> rk-00.txt >>