[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WG Consensus Call: draft-swallow-gmpls-overlay-00.txt
- To: John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>
- Subject: Re: WG Consensus Call: draft-swallow-gmpls-overlay-00.txt
- From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:01:24 -0500
- Cc: "'Varma, Eve L (Eve)'" <evarma@lucent.com>, "'Stephen Trowbridge'" <sjtrowbridge@lucent.com>, "'Lazer, Monica A, ALASO'" <mlazer@att.com>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, Khuzema Pithewan <khuzema.pithewan@metro-optix.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, swallow@cisco.com
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:38:02 PST." <9D42C6E086250248810DCADA39CE7EFC9720AD@nimbus>
> "It was agreed that further work related to Private-UNI/ILSI would take
> place under the auspices of UNI 2.0, and would not be a separate interface
> specification. In particular, that services of interest be extracted from
> oif2002.540 and submitted as UNI 2.0 candidates (see candidate #19)."
>
> As no subsequent contributions related to possible additional services were
> submitted, candidate #19 was ultimately dropped.
>
> Thus it is accurate to state that p-UNI/ILSI was not accepted (was rejected)
> as a separate interface specification.
I think what is more accurate to say is that those who were interested
in the Private-UNI/ILSI stopped pursing it becasue in the context of
UNI 2.0 it no longer met their customers' needs.
...George
==================================================================
George Swallow Cisco Systems (978) 497-8143
250 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, Ma 01824