RE: WG Consensus Call: draft-swallow-gmpls-overlay-00.txt

["Ong, Lyndon" <LyOng@ciena.com>]

Hi Kireeti,

Excuse my ignorance of the past history on this, but why are
the MPLS and GMPLS architecture documents Standards Track?
Most architecture documents I've seen have been Informational
(e.g., megaco, sigtran, iptel architectures) since these are
not specifications that can be tested through the usual IETF
process.

I have nothing against the GMPLS architecture, mind you, having 
added some text to it in the past.


Cheers,

Lyndon Ong