FW: reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot inYokohama

[Ron Bonica <Ronald.P.Bonica@wcom.com>]

This applies equally to the CCAMP WG

                         Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Loa
> Andersson
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: mpls wg; George Swallow; Scott Bradner
> Subject: reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot
> in Yokohama
>
>
> All,
>
> just a short reminder to those who have or are requesting agenda
> slots at the MPLS WG in Yokohama. Please consider this when you
> prepare for the meeting.
>
>
>
>          It is not the purpose of a WG session to have
>          presentation of the content of a document. It
>          is assumed that all attendees will have read the
>          drafts in advance of the meeting.
>
>          For documents that are work-in-progress, the
>          presentation should cover issues resolved since
>          the last draft followed by open issues and
>          controversial topics with the intent to reach a
>          resolution of said issues and topics.
>
>          For new work items, the presentation should focus on
>          what the problem is and why it is necessary for the
>          work group to address it.  Further it should be either
>          shown how it falls within the existing charter or why
>          and how the charter should be extended to encompass it.
>          The solution should only be sketched.
>
>          The appropriate way of bringing new work to the working
>          group is to send a draft to the mailing list and promoting
>          discussion on the list. Slots on the agenda should be used
>          to discuss outstanding topics that has not be solved on the
>          mailing list.
>
>          For new proposals addressing issues where
>          work-in-progess the presentation should focus
>          on the (perceived) short-fallings of the existing
>          work and why those issues need to be addressed
>          both in terms of why they are required and why they
>          cannot be addressed in the existing work.
>          the new work must be related to existing work (i.e.
>          compatible, mutually exclusive, outright replacement).
>          Finally, the new solution should be skechted,
>          explaining how the solution overcomes those issues.
>          The primary purpose of this last part is to allow commentary
>          from the floor, it should not be orientented toward selling
>          the idea.
>
>          In all cases only a limited number of slides should be used.
>          Speakers should budget their at least 25% of their time to
>          allow for questions.
>
> Loa and George
>
> --
> Loa Andersson
> Chief Architect,
> Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
> Utfors AB
> Råsundavägen 12
> Box 525, 169 29 Solna
> Office          +46 8 5270 2000
> Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
> Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
> Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
> WWW             www.utfors.se
>
>