[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SUKLM doubt

manoj,

see in-line...

manoj juneja wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
>         In draft draft-ietf-ccamp-sonet-sdh-05.txt, it is written that when
> a transparent STM-N/STS-3*N (N=1, 4, 16, 64, 256) is requested, the label is
> not applicable and is set to zero. Does this means all the fields viz
> {SUKLM} should be zero ? 

well, this seems at least and as indicated clear that all values are 
set to zero

Why not S value to be non-zero i.e. set to the
> lowest index in Nth multiplex (which will be 1) ?

because in this case internal structure (as pointed by the label) is not
applicable that's why you see "the label is not applicable", in the text
we have already received several comments on this item and the sentence
should be understood as "the {SUKLM} label is not applicable" i will try
to clarify this... 

- dimitri.
 
> Regards,
> manoj.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Website: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
Address: Alcatel - Optical NA, Fr. Wellesplein, 1 
         B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone:   Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361