Gino,
The draft points out the issues but the presentation in Minneapolis already
contained some possible suggestions to resolve some of them. These will be
documented in the next version of the draft.
Sven.
"Gino Carrozzo" <g.carrozzo@cpr.it> on 03/05/2002 10:30:02
To: "Zafar Ali" <zali@cisco.com>
cc: kireeti@juniper.net, "ccamp"
<ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, eric.mannie@gts.com,
Sven VAN DEN BOSCH/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
Subject Re: Path TLV
:
Dear Zafar,
if I'm not wrong, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt is going to
be ready for IETF Last Call,
but some points seems to be without a full consensus yet.
Anyway, is there any action in IETF now to solve "preliminary" FA-LSPs
issues (e.g. Pah TLV, FA color/metric assignment)? IMO,
draft-vandenbosch-mpls-fa-considerations-00.txt just points out these
issues!
Thanks
Gino
----- Original Message -----
From: Zafar Ali
To: Gino Carrozzo ; eric.mannie@gts.com
Cc: kireeti@juniper.net ; ccamp
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Path TLV
At 04:22 PM 5/2/2002 +0200, Gino Carrozzo wrote:
Hi all,
in draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt (Sec. 10.1) an OSPF/ISIS
Path TLV is proposed to handle the info about the path taken by an
FA-LSP
associated with a TE-Link (FA).
But the new versions of the GMPLS routing and hierarchy drafts
(i.e. lsp-hierarchy-05.txt / ospf-gmpls-extensions-06.txt /
isis-gmpls-extensions-10.txt)
does not describe this TLV.
Is this an editorial bug for the architecture-02 draft?
Dear Gino,
No; you may like to refer to the following draft for some "preliminary "
details on this subject.
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vandenbosch-mpls-fa-considerations-00.txt
Thanks
Regards... Zafar
Thanks
Gino
(See attached file: att1.htm)
|
Dear Zafar,
if I'm not wrong, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt is
going to be ready for IETF Last Call,
but some points seems to be without a full consensus yet.
Anyway, is there any action in IETF now to
solve "preliminary" FA-LSPs issues (e.g. Pah TLV, FA color/metric
assignment)? IMO, draft-vandenbosch-mpls-fa-considerations-00.txt
just points out these issues!
Thanks
Gino
|