[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Progressing draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-00.txt (WaspProgressing draft-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-frmwrk-00.txt)
Hello Zhi,
I gave an incorrect name, and that has caused much confusion (received
quite a few off line emails :-)). Sorry about the goof-up.
The document I was referring to is:
draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-00.txt
and is available at
ftp://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-00.txt
Hope this solves the confusion I created.
-Vishal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhi-Wei Lin [mailto:zwlin@lucent.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:56 AM
> To: v.sharma@ieee.org
> Cc: Kireeti Kompella; CCAMP; Greg Bernstein; Eric Mannie; Ronald P.
> Bonica
> Subject: Re: Progressing draft-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-frmwrk-00.txt
>
>
> Hi Vishal,
>
> I did not see the document you referred to in the subject line
> (draft-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-frmwrk-00.txt)...is it some other document
> you had in mind? Maybe you mean the sonet-sdh-extensions-01?
>
> Zhi
>
>
> Vishal Sharma wrote:
>
> >Hi Kireeti
> >
> >The latest version of the above draft is now available on the IETF
> >drafts directory. As per your email below, we'd like to request
> >that this document be taken up for Last Call by the WG.
> >
> >We'd be happy to make any modifications that emerge from the
> >last call, and prepare a final version of the document for
> >progressing it through the RFC process.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >-Vishal
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> >>Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> >>Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:42 AM
> >>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> >>Subject: Document status
> >>
> >>
> >>Here is the document status as presented in CCAMP 53. Please read,
> >>especially if you are an author, and send corrections to Ron and me.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Kireeti.
> >>-------
> >>Finished Last Call in MPLS and CCAMP WGs
> >>draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05.txt
> >>draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt
> >>draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt
> >>have implementation status, so ready for IETF Last Call
> >>
> >>Call for consensus to send to IETF Last Call
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-01.txt -- informational
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt -- informational
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-00.txt -- informational
> >>
> >>One more WG Last Call for final changes, then IETF Last Call
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-03.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-03.txt -- proposed standard
> >>
> >>WG Last Call
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-02.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-04.txt -- proposed standard
> >>
> >>Call for consensus for WG Last Call
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-01.txt ? -- proposed standard
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-00.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-ietf-ccamp-oli-reqts-00.txt -- informational
> >>
> >>Any objections to making this a WG document?
> >>draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-03.txt -- proposed standard
> >>
> >>Call for consensus to make into WG documents
> >>draft-bellato-ccamp-g709-framework-01.txt -- informational
> >>draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt --
> >>proposed standard
> >>draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-lbm-tdm-01.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-mannie-gmpls-recovery-terminology-00.txt -- informational
> >>draft-bonica-tuntrace-02.txt -- informational
> >>
> >>Update, followed by call for consensus to make WG docs
> >>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-label-mib-01.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-01.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-01.txt -- proposed standard
> >>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-01.txt -- proposed standard
> >>
> >>Call for Design Team for "GMPLS Profile for ASON/ASTN"
> >> -- understand more clearly what needs to be done here
> >> -- figure out if a design team is needed (or just a set of IDs)
> >>
> >
>