[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CCAMP WG Last Call on GMPLS Routing Documents
These routing documents do not cover many SONET/SDH cases at all.
Even though it is generic routing, SONET/SDH is included in these and
do not take care of TSI (Time Slot Interchangable) issues and protection
related issues.
Here is the list of issues:
1. Certain links are TSI capable - and certain are not. In this case, one
needs to know the group of nodes that belong to this category (e.g.
Ring ID for BLSR ) so that one can do path computation properly.
2. How to advertise bandwidth on Non-TSI links? Since one need to use
same labels (time slots ) on all these links, one has to know all available
time slots or advertise virtual links (pt-2-pt links) between all these nodes.
Was there any discussion on these documents?
Thanks,
Suresh
At 03:14 PM 4/3/2002 -0800, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This is to announce a two week WG Last Call on the GMPLS routing
>documents, i.e.:
>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-03.txt
>draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-05.txt
>
>FYI: these documents are intended to be Standards Track.
>
>The Last Call will end at 1700 EDT, April 17th.
>
>Kireeti.