[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Generalized Signaling documents



Randy,

> >> I suggest that the group of current authors/editors work out
> >> a reasonable number of people to be on the list.
> >> I was giving guidelines that we (in IESG discussion) have 
> >> used in the past.
> > So, you seem to suggest that the guidelines that the IESG "have
> > used in the past" was to have no more than 3 to 4 authors.
> 
> maybe it seems that way to you, but no one said that.
> 
> but it will be so now.  no exact number, but no longs lists.

Does that represent your own position, or the position of the
IESG as the whole ?

Yakov.