[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GMPLS Signaling Implementation Survey Form




All,
         If you'd like to answer this anonymously, please send your results 
to Scott Bradner (sob@harvard.edu).  He'll remove your identify / contact 
info and forward it along to be included in the survey.

Thanks,
Lou

PS To be included in the first draft of the survey, please have your forms 
in by COB March 13.

At 03:18 PM 3/1/2002, Berger, Lou wrote:

>All,
>
>If you'd like to participate in a GMPLS signaling implementation survey,
>please complete (as much as you can/want) and return the enclosed.  We will
>consolidate all answers and publish the results (to the list and as a draft.)
>
>Thank you,
>Lou (and Yakov)
>
>----------------------------------
>GMPLS Signaling Implementation Survey Form                          [V 1.0]
>
>     This is form is derived from V2.2 of the "RSVP and QoS Implementation
>     Survey Information Form" authored by Gene Gaines 
> <ggaines@generation.net>
>     and Marco Festa <festa@cefriel.it>.  See
> 
><http://www.iit.nrc.ca/IETF/RSVP_survey/rsvp-qos_quest_980210.txt>http://www.iit.nrc.ca/IETF/RSVP_survey/rsvp-qos_quest_980210.txt. 
>
>
>     This form is also available from
> 
><http://www.labn.net/gmpls/sig-survey.txt>http://www.labn.net/gmpls/sig-survey.txt 
>
>=======================================================================
>
>1.  Organization:
>
>1.1   Organization url(s):
>
>2.  Product title(s):
>
>2.1   Brief description(s):
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>3.  Contact for GMPLS information
>3.1   Name:
>
>3.2   Title:
>
>3.3   E-mail:
>
>3.4   Organization/department:
>
>3.5   Postal address:
>
>3.6   Phone:
>
>3.7   Fax:
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>4.  Status:
>4.1     [ ] Development
>4.2     [ ] Alpha
>4.3     [ ] Beta
>4.4     [ ] Product
>4.5     [ ] Other (describe):
>
>5.  Switching capabilities
>5.1     [ ] PSC
>5.2     [ ] TDM
>5.3     [ ] LSC
>5.4     [ ] FSC
>
>6. Reference Drafts (please list, include version numbers)
>6.1    [ ]
>6.2    [ ]
>6.3    [ ]
>6.4    [ ]
>6.5    [ ]
>6.6    [ ]
>
>7. Interface technologies
>7.1    [ ] Frame Relay
>7.2    [ ] ATM
>7.3    [ ] Ethernet V2/DIX
>7.4    [ ] Ethernet 802.3
>7.5    [ ] SDH
>7.6    [ ] SONET
>7.7    [ ] Lambda (photonic)
>7.8    [ ] Fiber
>7.9    [ ] FiberChannel
>7.10   [ ] Other (describe):
>
>8. Availability
>8.1    [ ] Public and free
>8.2    [ ] Only to selected organizations/companies but free
>8.3    [ ] On sale.
>8.4    [ ] For internal company use only
>8.5    [ ] Other:
>
>9. Implementation based on:  (check all that apply)
>9.1    [ ] Purchased code (please list source if possible)
>9.2    [ ] Free code (please list source if possible)
>9.3    [ ] Internal implementation (no outside code, just from specs)
>9.4    [ ] Internal implementation on top of purchased or free code
>9.4.1      [ ] List portions from external source
>9.4.2      [ ] List portions developed internally
>
>10.  Supported Label Types
>10.1  [ ] MPLS Label
>10.2  [ ] Generalized Label
>10.3  [ ] Waveband Label
>10.4  [ ] SONET/SDH Label
>
>11.  Label Related
>11.1  [ ] Suggested Label
>11.2  [ ] Label Set
>
>12.  Traffic Parameters
>12.1  [ ] Intserv (Please list which)
>12.2  [ ] CR-LDP
>12.3  [ ] GMPLS Bandwidth Encoding
>12.4  [ ] SONET/SDH
>
>13.   [ ] Bidirectional LSPs
>
>14.  Notification
>14.1 [ ] Acceptable Label Set
>14.2 [ ] Notify Request Objects (GMPLS-RSVP)
>14.3 [ ] Notify Message (GMPLS-RSVP)
>14.4 [ ] Removing State with a PathErr message (GMPLS-RSVP)
>
>15  Other features
>15.1  [ ] Explicit Label Control
>15.2  [ ] Protection Information
>15.3  [ ] Administrative Status Information
>15.4  [ ] Interface Identification
>15.5  [ ] Errored Interface Identification
>15.6  [ ] Link Fault Handling
>15.7  [ ] Nodal Fault Handling
>
>16. Other specification(s) which apply:
>
>17. Other features supported:
>
>18. Currently-defined GMPLS signaling features not supported:
>
>19. Notes (please describe purpose of project, give any information that
>        might be useful to those interested in developing or using GMPLS)
>
>20. If you feel the above categories are not complete, add others which
>        will better describe your project:
>
>=======================================================================
>
>Person filling out this form:
>
>       Name:
>
>       E-mail:
>
>       Tel.:
>
>       Title:
>
>       Company:
>
>       Date prepared:
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Return your information to the authors:
>
>       Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com> or <lberger@labn.net> and
>       Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
>
>       all returned information will be consolidated and reported
>       to the CCAMP WG mailing list.
>
>Thank you!
>
>Updated 03/01/02
>
>--end--
>