RE: WG document status

["Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALASO" <gash@att.com>]

Kireeti,

> > Regarding the generalized signaling draft, I submitted
> > several comments after the last IETF identifying technical
> > issues

> WG Last Call for this draft is over.  And over.  And over.  It's
> DONE.  Consensus was rather rough.  That's a pity -- it would be
> nice to make everyone happy.

Yes, last call was *declared* over.  But the SDH/SONET issue pertains to this draft too.  And that comment was made again.  And again.  And again.  And still *not* resolved.

> Right now, the only issue on the signaling front is the SDH/SONET
> label issue.  And that's a _different_ draft.

Disagree.  As Deborah just said again on Monday, the SONET/SDH label issue applies to the gen-signaling draft too, where the SDH and SONET labels are defined.  This comment has been made again.  And again.  And now again.

Jerry Ash